Warning: PHP Startup: A session is active. You cannot change the session module's ini settings at this time in /ojs-3.3.0-14/ojs/lib/pkp/classes/session/SessionManager.inc.php on line 71

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /ojs-3.3.0-14/ojs/lib/pkp/classes/session/SessionManager.inc.php:71) in /ojs-3.3.0-14/ojs/plugins/generic/citationStyleLanguage/CitationStyleLanguagePlugin.inc.php on line 478

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /ojs-3.3.0-14/ojs/lib/pkp/classes/session/SessionManager.inc.php:71) in /ojs-3.3.0-14/ojs/plugins/generic/citationStyleLanguage/CitationStyleLanguagePlugin.inc.php on line 479
TY - JOUR AU - Lisowska, Urszula PY - 2020/01/17 Y2 - 2024/05/18 TI - Ivan Karamazov’s rebellion in Albert Camus’ and Karl Jaspers’ interpretations JF - Journal of Education Culture and Society JA - JECS VL - 1 IS - 2 SE - Articles DO - 10.15503/jecs20102.5.14 UR - https://www.e-methodology.eu/index.php/jecs/article/view/837 SP - 5-14 AB - <p><span style="left: 177.233px; top: 454.261px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.941222);">The aim of this study is to present Albert Camus’</span><span style="left: 588.717px; top: 454.261px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.912336);">and Karl Jaspers’</span><span style="left: 729.717px; top: 454.263px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.932659);"> interpretations of </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 488.861px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.903761);">Ivan Karamazov’s rebellion as the diagnoses of the weakness of the human intellect in </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 523.263px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.949181);">confrontation with the world and the criticism of rationalism. Therefore, in the introduction I </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 557.863px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.94975);">will present tho</span><span style="left: 245.033px; top: 557.861px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.92693);">se fragments of the novel that characterize Ivan’s rebellion as highly abstract </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 592.263px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.886962);">and theoretical. At the same time, this common literary context serves as the ground for </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 626.863px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.87928);">reconstruction and comparison of the basic philosophical assumptions of each author. The </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 661.261px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.909794);">intention of the remaining part of the paper is, firstly, to reconstruct A. Camus’ and K. </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 695.861px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.865004);">Jaspers’</span><span style="left: 195.033px; top: 695.861px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.929575);">epistemology and, secondly, to analyse the arguments against Ivan’s attitude </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 730.263px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.953455);">formu</span><span style="left: 167.033px; top: 730.261px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.948698);">lated by the writers. Their criticisms of the protagonist’s excessive trust in intellect is </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 764.863px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.923075);">based on their own concepts of human epistemic capacity, which are related to the problems </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 799.297px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.912022);">of the </span><span style="left: 178.833px; top: 799.294px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.902726);">absurd in A. Camus’ and transcendence in K. Jaspers’ writings. Th</span><span style="left: 761.317px; top: 799.297px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.897217);">e question of </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 833.894px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.961063);">nihilism demands analysis of A. Camus’ idea of the nature of rebellion as both affirmative </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 868.294px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.923647);">and negative, and of K. Jaspers’ notion of faith as pre</span><span style="left: 606.517px; top: 868.297px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.954872);">-intellectual trust. Finally, their </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 902.894px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.934678);">criticisms of the slogan “If there is no God, then anything is allowed” introduces the problem </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 937.297px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.91297);">of freedom, which allows the comparison of the concepts of solidarity (A. Camus) and </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 971.897px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.908173);">communication (K. Jaspers). In the conclusion these two philosophical attitudes are discussed </span><span style="left: 118.24px; top: 1006.3px; font-size: 20px; font-family: sans-serif; transform: scaleX(0.905722);">together. </span></p> ER -