• Ineta Luka TuribaUniversity, Department of Languages Graudu 68, Riga, LV-1058, Latvia



blended-learning, learning platform, language competence, 21st century skills, cultural awareness


Aim. This article aims to evaluate the target course created and the development of adult learners’ 21st century skills during the course implementation in six EU countries.

Concept. European Cultural Heritage and Skills Development Course is a culture-based blended-learning course created within the framework of the Erasmus+ project “Cultural Knowledge and Language Competences as a Means to Develop 21stCentury Skills” conducted in six EU countries: Croatia, Latvia, Slovenia, Romania, Poland and Czech Republic (Project No.2018-1-HR-01-KA204-047430; 2018-2021). The course content is presented in a form of a story, applying innovative methodologies and tools increasing adult learners’ cultural knowledge and ensuring the skills development. This article focusses on blended-learning in particular, and the course evaluation given by learners and teachers after the course implementation in the six partner countries as well as the development of adult learners’ 21st century skills.

Results and conclusion.The results indicate a positive evaluation of the learning platform, the learning methodologies and tasks as well as a positive trend considering the development of learners’ 21st century skills, including the English language competences. Although the results varied from country to country, no extremely significant differences between the evaluation done by learners and the teachers were found, thus the course may be applicable to adult teaching/learning.

Practical application.The created blended-learning course may be a viable option for developing adult learners’ 21st century skills and increasing their cultural awareness of the less known EU intangible cultural heritage.  

Originality.The contribution describes the difference between flipped, hybrid and blended-learning and introduces a novel approach of creating a blended-learning course for adult learners.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ineta Luka, TuribaUniversity, Department of Languages Graudu 68, Riga, LV-1058, Latvia

Ineta Luka – Dr.paed. Mg.philol, Professor, Head of the Language Department of Turiba University, Latvia. The author of more than 70 papers on language teaching/learning, competence development, higher education efficiency, lifelong learning, etc. in internationally reviewed editions, 2 monographs and 5 book chapters on teaching/learning in HEIs. Member of ASEM (Asia-Europe meeting) LLL Hub, Research NW4 “National Strategies for LLL”, convenor of EERA NW11 “Educational Improvement and Quality Assurance”, expert of the Academy of Sciences of Latvia in Education Sciences and Management, Honorary Professor of Turiba University, member of the Association of Professors of Latvia. E-mail:



Allen, E.I., Seaman, J.,&Garret, R. (2007). Blending in. The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.

Archee, R. (2015).Is Blended Learning Making Us Stupid, too? Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3,65-70.

Arnold-Garza, S. (2014). The Flipped Classroom Teaching Model and Its Use for Information Literacy Instruction. Communications in Information Literacy, 8(1), 7-22. Retrieved May 1, 2021, from

Boyarsky, K. (2020). What Is Hybrid Learning? Here's Everything You Need to Know. OwlLabs.Retrieved May 1, 2021, from,video%20conferencing%20hardware%20and%20software.

Cocquyrt, C., Zhu, C.,Diep, A.N., De Greef, M.,&Vanwing, T. (2019).Examining the role of learning support in blended learning foradults' social inclusion and social capital. Computers & Education,142(103610), 1-19.

Dewey, J. (1929). The Quest for Certainty. In: J. Boydston(Ed.) (1988).The Later Works: 1925-1953, Vol.4. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

El Refae, G.A., Kaba, A., &Eletter, S. (2021). Distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic: satisfaction, opportunities and challenges as perceived by faculty members and students.Interactive Technology and Smart Education, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.

Fandiño, F.G.E.,&Velandia, A.J.S. (2020). How an online tutor motivates E-learning English. Heliyon,6(e04630), 1-7.

Fisher, R.L., LaFerriere, R., &Rixon, A. (2020).Flipped learning: An effective pedagogy with an Achilles’ heel.Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(5), 543-554.

FLN. (2014).The Four Pillars of F-L-I-P. Flipped Learning Network. Retrieved May 3, 2021, from

Friesen, N. (2012). Report: Defining Blended Learning.Retrieved May 3, 2021, from

Güzer, B.,&Caner, H. (2014). The past, present and future of blended learning: an in-depthanalysis of literature. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,116, 4596-4603.

Hrastinski, S. (2019). What Do We Mean by Blended Learning?TechTrends, 63(5), 564-569.

Hubackova, S. (2015). Blended learning – new stage in the foreign language teaching. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,197, 1957-1961.

Hubackova, S.,&Semradova, I. (2016). Evaluation of blended learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,217, 551-557.

Hwang, G.Y., Yin, C., & Chu, H.C. (2019).The era of flippedlearning: promoting active learning and higher order thinking with innovative flipped learningstrategies and supporting systems.Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 991-994.

Ismaili, Y. (2021). Evaluation of students’ attitude toward distance learning during the pandemic (Covid-19): a case study of ELTE university.On the Horizon, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.

Klimova, B.F.,&Kacetl, J. (2015). Hybrid learning and its current role in the teaching of foreign languages. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,182, 477-481.

Koşar, G. (2016). A Study of EFL instructors’ perception of blended learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,232, 736-744.

Lai, C.,&Li, G. (2011). Technology and task-based language teaching: A critical review.CALICO Journal, 28(2), 498-521.

Luka, I. (ed). (2018). B1/B2 English language course curriculum. Retrieved May 6, 2021, from

Luka, I. (2019). Creating a Culture-Based Language Learning Course for Developing Adult Learners’ 21st Century Skills. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 10(2), 151-169,

Lungu, I. (2013). The Increasing Need for Blended-Learning Models in Courses of English for Specific Courses in Romanian Universities. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,76, 470-475.

MacIntyre, P.,Gregersen, T.,&Mercer, S. (2020). Language teachers’ coping strategies during the Covid-19conversion to online teaching: Correlations with stress,wellbeing and negative emotions. System,94(102352),1-13.

Matukhin, D.,&Zhitkova, E. (2015). Implementing Blended Learning Technology in Higher ProfessionalEducation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,206, 183-188.

Maulam, S.M.,&Ibrahim, R. (2012). The teaching and learning of English for Academic Purposes in blended learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,67, 561-570.

Miyazoe, T.,&Anderson, T. (2012). Discuss, reflect, and collaborate: A qualitative analysis of forum, blog, and wiki use in EFL blended learning course. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,34, 146-152.

O’Hanlon, F. (2019). Mixed-Methods Research: Achieving a Robust Design. In: L. Hamilton, & J. Ravenscroft(Eds.),Building Research Design in Education (pp.107-131). London: Bloomsbury Academy.

Ossiannilsson, E. (2016). Challenges and Opportunities for Active and Hybrid Learning related to UNESCO Post 2015. In: J. Keengwe, & G. Onchwari(Eds.), Handbook of Research on Active Learning and the Flipped Classroom Model in the Digital Age (pp.333-351). USA: IGI Global.

Prokhorets, E.K., Plekhanova, M.V., &Scherbinina, N.G. (2015). Instructional Designof Foreign Language Blended Courses. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 215, 161-169.

Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I.,&Depaepe F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23,269-290.

Rasheed, R.A.,Kamsin, A.,&Abdullah, N.A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144(103701), 1-17.

Rodrigues, H., Almeida, F., Figueiredo, V., & Lopes, S.L. (2019). Tracking e-learning through published papers:A systematic review. Computers and Education,136, 87-98.

Šafranj, J. (2013). Using Information Technology in English Language LearningProcedure: Blended Learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 514-521.

Thomas, G. (2009). How to do Your Research Project. London: SAGE.

Tosun, S. (2015). The effects of blended learning on EFL students’ vocabularyenhancement. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,199, 641-647.

Tymms, P. (2017). Questionnaires. In: R. Coe, M. Waring, L.V. Hedges, & J. Arthur (Eds.), Research methods & methodologies in education (pp.223-233). Los Angeles: Sage.

UNESCO. (2021a). Supporting learning recovery: one year into COVID-19. The Global Education Coalition in Action, March 2021.Retrieved May 7, 2021, from

UNESCO. (2021b). One year into COVID: Prioritizing education recovery to avoid a generational catastrophe. Report of UNESCO online conference on 29 March 2021.Retrieved May 4, 2021, from

Zitter, I., &Hoeve, A. (2012). Hybrid LearningEnvironments: Merging Learning and Work Processes toFacilitate Knowledge Integration and Transitions. OECD Education Working Papers, 81, OECD Publishing.




How to Cite