Significant artifacts in schools: teacher and pupil perspectives


  • Sandra Kaire Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, Universiteto str. 9/1, LT-01513, Vilnius



school culture, school artifacts, teacher, pupil, pride and privacy


Drawing on the recent research ‘Dominant and demotic school culture: analysis of tensions fields’ this paper analyses found artifacts in 6 different Lithuanian secondary schools. The visual data was collected by making images of places and artifacts which were mentioned during the walks in the school territory with one teacher and one pupil afterwards. The analysis of images focuses particularly on two aspects: a) which artifacts are significant for teachers and pupils in the schools? b)  What do these artifacts mean for teachers and pupils? Therefore, the analysis is based on comparing walks among teachers and pupils in all schools. The analysis shows obvious differences on re/presented artifacts among teachers and pupils. The teachers emphasized and showed those artifacts which on one way or another represent their schools’ achievements, like pupils’ sport achievements, pupils’ artworks, and honored pupils’ displays, and were related with aspects of pride. The paper argues the possible reasons for the importance of pride in schools. Meanwhile, pupils were highlighting spaces they like to gather around during non-learning time. Pupils appreciate less visible places because it is possible to have some privacy there. As analysis shows, different sitting artifacts (chairs, sofas, beanbags) play an important role for creating such private pupils’ ‘oases’. On the other hand, such artifacts, as pupils’ artworks, information displays, and sport achievements, seem to be meaningful for pupils if they were contributing in the creation process or were mentioned in these artifacts.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sandra Kaire, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, Universiteto str. 9/1, LT-01513, Vilnius

Master of education. At the moment PhD candidate in Education. intercultural education, non-formal and experiential learning, visual research in education.


Deal, E. D.; Peterson D. K. (2009). Shaping school culture. Pitfalls, paradoxes, and promises. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Gordon, T., Lahelma, E. (1996). School is like an ant's nest': spatiality and embodiment in schools. Gender and Education, 8(3), 301-310. doi: 10.1080/09540259621548

Hall, S. (1997). Introduction, in S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 1-12). London: Sage.

Halverson, R. R. (2003). Systems of practice: how leaders use artifacts to create professional community in schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(37). Retrieved from

Halverson, R. R. (2007). How leaders use artifacts to structure professional community of schools. In L. Stoll, K. Seashore Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas (pp. 93-105). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

Happel, A. (2013). Ritualized girling: school uniforms and the compulsory performance of gender. Journal of Gender Studies, 22(1), 92-96. doi: 10.1080/09589236.2012.745680

Hearn, H., Thomson, P. (2014). Working with texts, images and artefacts. In A. Clark, R. Flewitt, M. Hammersley, M. Robb (Eds.), Understanding research with children and young people (pp. 154-168). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Huss, A. J. (2007). The role of school uniforms in creating an academically motivating climate: do uniforms influence teacher expectations? Journal of Ethnographic and Qualitative Research 2007, 1, 31-39. Retrieved from

McCorskey, C. J.; McVetta W.R. (1978). Classroom seating arrangements: instructional communication theory versus student preference. Communication Education, 27, 99-111. Retrieved from

National agency for school evaluation. External evaluation. Basic information (2015). Retrieved from

O’Donaghue, D. (2006). Situating space and place in the making of masculinities in schools. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 3(1), 15-33. doi: 10.1080/15505170.2006.10411569.

O’Donaghue, D. (2007). ‘James always hangs out here’: making space for place in studying masculinities at school. Journal of Visual Studies, 22(1), 62-73. doi: 10.1080/14725860601167218

Prosser, J. (1999). The Evolution of School Culture Research. In J. Prosser (Ed.), School culture (pp. 1-14). London: Paul Chapman.

Prosser, J. (2007). Visual methods and visual culture of schools. Visual Studies, 22(1), 13-30. doi: 10.1080/14725860601167143

Prosser J., Warburton T. (1999). Visual sociology and school culture. In J. Prosser (Ed.) School culture (pp. 82-97). London: Paul Chapman.

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Survutaite, D. (2015). Unikalios kulturos mokykla [Unique school culture]. Svietimo problemos analize, 3(127). Retrieved from

Webster’s New Universal Unabridged Dictionary (1994). New Jersey: Barnes & Noble Books.




How to Cite

Kaire, S. (2016). Significant artifacts in schools: teacher and pupil perspectives. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 7(2), 131–149.