“Distance and Avatar” – selected elements of computer-mediated communication (CMC) and the reception of self-presentation contents


  • Luba Jakubowska The Witelon State University of Applied Sciences in Legnica Department of Pedagogy Sejmowa 5A, 59-220 Legnica


CMC, avatar, distance, self-presentation


The research pertains to the relevance of selected features of CMC to the reception of self-presentation contents. I checked whether the place of residence (distance) between the sender the recipient of self-presentation can change the attractiveness of a self-presentation. The second hypothesis pertains to the influence of avatars on self-presentation. I assumed that a negative avatar can decrease the attractiveness of self-presentation, and a positive one can increase it. The avatars and the names of towns and cities were randomly allotted to the persons who would present them. That is why, in theory, they were to have no bearing on what the persons would say about themselves. 10 presentations by persons applying for a job were used.

Each self-presentation was analysed with the use of the ANOVA model. In the case of half of the self-presentations the hypotheses were confirmed – small distance increased the attractiveness of the self-presentations, and a negative avatar decreased it.

The research has provided a number of conclusions as to its technical aspect. I treat these conclusions as preparation for broader research in which I am going to examine the relevance of five features of CMC to the attractiveness of self-presentation. Even at the present stage I can state that such research requires a thorough experimental plan both in its factual and technical aspect.


Download data is not yet available.


Brockman, J. (1996). Digerati: Encounters with the Cyber Elite. San Francisco: HardWired.

Gogołek, W. (2010). Komunikacja sieciowa uwarunkowania kategorie i paradoksy [Net communication: conditionings, categories, and paradoxes]. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza ASPRA-JR.

Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177-192.

Kobylarek, A. (2008). Psychologiczne pułapki komunikacji w Internecie [Psychological traps of Internet communication]. In: M. Sokołowski (Ed.), Oblicza Internetu Opus Universale. Kulturowe, edukacyjne i technologiczne aspekty Internetu [Faces of the Internet. Opus Universale. Cultural, educational, and technological aspects of the Internet]. Elbląg: PWSZ w Elblągu.

Leary, M. (2007). Wywieranie wrażenia na innych, o sztuce autoprezentacji [Influencing others, on the art of self-presentation]. Gdańsk: GWP.

McQuail, D. (2008). Teoria komunikowania masowego [Theory of mass communication]. Warszawa: PWN.

Moon Y., (1999). The Effects of Physical Distance and Response Latency on Persuasion in Computer-Mediated Communication and Human-Computer Communication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 5(4), 379-392.

Newlands, A., Anderson, A. H., Mullin, J. (2003). Adapting Communicative Strategies to Computer-Mediated Communication: An Analysis of Task Performance and Dialogue Structure. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 325–348.

Paluchowski, W.J. (Ed.) (2009). Internet a psychologia, możliwości i zagrożenia [Internet and the psychology of possibility and threat]. Warszawa: PWN.

Riva G., (2002). The Sociocognitive Psychology of Computer-Mediated Communication: The Present and Future of Technology-Based Interactions, Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5(6), 581-598.

Shannon, C., Weaver, W. (1948). A Mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Smith, M.A., (1992). Voices from the WELL: The Logic of the Virtual Commons. Retrieved from http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/csoc/papers/voices/Voices.htm.

Suler, J. (1996). The Psychology of Cyberspace, The Basic Psychological Features of Cyberspace. Retrieved from http://www-usr.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/basicfeat.html.

Szmajke, A. (1999). Autoprezentacja. Maski, Pozy, Miny [Self-presentation. Masks, poses, facial expressions]. Olsztyn: Ursa Consulting.

Szpunar, M. (2009), Kompetencje komunikacyjne w komunikacji mediowanej komputerowo [Communication competences in computer-mediated communication]. In: J. Ulicka (Ed.), Tekst (w) sieci, literatura społeczeństwo, komunikacja [Text (on) the web, literature, society, communication], vol. 1 (pp. 121-130). Warszawa: WAiP.

Tutty, J.I Ć, & Klein, J.D., (2008). Computer-mediated instruction: a comparison of on-line and face-to-face collaboration. Education Tech Research Dev, 56, 101–124.

Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational Aspects of Computer-mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time Organization. Science, 6 (2), 186-203.

Winterhoff – Spurk, P. (2007). Psychologia mediów [Psychology of media]. Kraków: WAM.

Zawojski, P. (2010). Cyberkultura: Syntopia sztuki, nauki i technologii [Cyberculture: Syntopy of art, science, and technology]. Warszawa: Poltext.




How to Cite

Jakubowska, L. (2017). “Distance and Avatar” – selected elements of computer-mediated communication (CMC) and the reception of self-presentation contents. Edutainment, 1(1). Retrieved from https://www.e-methodology.eu/index.php/EDUT/article/view/10.15503.edut.2016.1.63.71